Saturday, November 2, 2013
Restorative Justice
I think restorative justice is very interesting and potentially realistic alternative to the traditional justice system. I think certainly for minor offenses such as unarmed robbery it worth pursuing. People usually rob out of desperation not malice. Therefore, they are likely to be repent for their crime and will not offend again when they are released. Also, through a restorative justice program, robbers are less likely to become hardened and resentful in prison. I think murder is a very different circumstance. Serial murders should without question go through the traditional justice system. It is imperative that they spend the receive life sentences because they will kill again if they are ever released. In Connor McBride's case, I think the restorative justice was not necessarily a bad idea. I think he is repent for killing Ann Grosmaire and aware that he needs to address his anger issues. He is not making excuses for himself. I think through the restorative justice program, he may truly be rehabilitated and learn to control his temper. I do not think he will a threat to the public when he is released. I think the restorative justice is in keeping with Catholic Social teaching. Although McBride violated the teaching about the life and dignity the human person, he himself is still a person. I think the teaching promotes forgiveness. By forgiving McBride, the Grosmaires upheld his dignity. The restorative justice program gives people the opportunity to considered forgiveness rather than hate. Hate tends to be bred in the traditional justice system, and it also prevents healing. I think in many ways restorative justice can be a better option.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment